The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (X! · talk)  · @163  ·  02:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

51Give[edit]

51Give (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP, WP:NOT, WP:SPAM and WP:COI. Article was created by a WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related 51give.com.

I am also nominating the following related pages apart of the same non notable spam campaign:

51SIM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -speedied previously as spam under 51SIM Social Innovation Movement

Daniel Foa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Hiu Ng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Riddled with press releases and SEO "self-links to their site and blogs, Self-promotion and product placement are WP:NOT the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 (talk) 06:59, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The 51give article may also be a copyvio, all our in part I can not tell. I vote delete. TomStar81 (Talk • Some say ¥€$, I say NO) 07:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As far as I'm concerned, This does not meet WP:GNG. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harlem675 (talk • contribs) 07:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete For reasons given above. Not notable and reads like an advertisement. [mad pierrot][t c] 09:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all. Fails WP:CORP, founders fail WP:BIO Niteshift36 (talk) 05:16, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per nom.--Danaman5 (talk) 03:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for failing WP:GNG (and respective "genre" reqirements, e.g. WP:CORP) and WP:SPAM. --EEMIV (talk) 17:41, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.