The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. >Radiant< 09:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Tree Full of Secrets

[edit]

Not notable collection of bootleg recordings with no acceptable independent sources. Unverifiable. See [[1]] for a similar case. The Parsnip! 21:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom--Whs tc hy 01:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*Merge to List of Pink Floyd ROIOs. I nominated this article for merge a little while back and only got one vote to keep. If this gets deleted, I'll give it a small section there, since this is a pretty big bootleg. --ASDFGHJKL=Greatest Person Ever+Coolest Person Ever 21:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep since List of Pink Floyd ROIOs got deleted. --ASDFGHJKL=Greatest Person Ever+Coolest Person Ever 01:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sr 13 03:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm just not convinced. PF are without doubt notable, but of course that's not really the point. Scream Thy Last Scream and Vegetable Man are certainly notable (see Nick Kent: The Dark Stuff) and I would contend that I'm A King Bee and Lucy Leave are notable PF recordings by virtue of their extremely early date. I can't comment on the post-Syd recordings because I never took much interest in the band after he was gone but I'm sure others can comment. The position I'll take is that what we have here amounts to an extremely long stub; with a slew of annotation it could be the basis for a group of interesting and informative articles. BTLizard 10:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Not to sound offensive here, but I'm getting that you want it delete by your comment, could you clear this up please? --Whs itc hy 04:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I think the case for deletion has yet to be established. Some of the Syd-era recordings in the set certainly are notable; what we need is comment on the later material so that we can come to a view on the overall notability of the set. As present my view is that we should keep the article. BTLizard 09:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you helps clear it up--Whs itc hy 15:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Its a well known ROIO, although i would say its a bit too long - Ummagumma23 21:45 28 May 2007 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.