The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Afrijitsu Combative System[edit]

Afrijitsu Combative System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a non-notable martial art. It makes no claims of notability and has no independent sources. I could find no reliable sources that show it is notable. The original AfD discussion result was to "userfy and delete". Papaursa (talk) 01:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Papaursa (talk) 01:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lacks multiple independent and reliable sources with significant coverage, so fails notability. Edison (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I found no independent sources that show notability and the article doesn't make any notability claims. I don't see how this passes WP:MANOTE. I also don't understand how the first AfD said "delete", but the article remained. Astudent0 (talk) 16:33, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete nothing in gnews [1]. LibStar (talk) 23:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.