The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 talk 12:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amanullah Nezami[edit]

Amanullah Nezami (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Second nomination. From the moment it was closed as no consensus, the article is not improved with no evidence of notability added. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but not notability. I expect to see review of his collection, impact on culture, exhibitions or/and participation in movie festivals? Not every collector is entitled to an article Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:37, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.