The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Analysing e-commerce web sites

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some weird crossover between WP:NOTSOAPBOX and "not Wikiversity". Either way, non-encyclopedic essay material. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:40, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete weird is the right word. i'd say something about WP:NOTTWILIGHTZONE but unfortunately, that's not always the case. probably WP:NOTMANUAL is applicable here. — Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 21:33, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Was just made today, but is bulleted essay w/ no sources MadCow257 (talk) 22:03, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Reads like a bad machine translation of a sales brochure. The designed web sites for the organization should give a very much of facilities to its users. The below are some of them. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.