The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Schools are not de facto notable if they can be proved to exist, per the explanation at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. It's likely that the essay WP:UNIN is outdated. (Incidentally, I went ahead and removed the word "guideline" from the title of that essay to avoid confusion.) In the absence of sources to establish the notability of the school, the article must be deleted. I'm happy to restore the article to draft space if someone wants to work on it. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apeejay Stya University

[edit]
Apeejay Stya University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable university in India with no sources establishing the school's existence outside of few links that mention the school in passing. From my own research, I was not able to find anything mentioning the school that as having passed basic general notability guidelines for it to have its own article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:13, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But UNIN is not a guideline or policy as stated. But we have an issue with this article as no sources are used to lay out the school's history, what it teaches, and all "news" sources mention it in passing. Notability is still a requirement. This doesn't meet it. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:27, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The word "guideline" should really be removed from the title of that essay. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This place may be accredited but sources have to establish not just the accreditation but for the school itself. GNG still matters which this doesn't meet. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:56, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 14:00, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.