The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 21:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Audra Hardt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Appears to fail WP:MUSIC: A magazine nomination for best unsigned artist does not meet #8 (Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury or Grammis award) and independently released albums do not meet #5 (Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable). No other assertion of notability is made and all refs are to imdb which is not a reliable source. Ros0709 (talk) 19:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom -- Gmatsuda (talk) 22:38, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference and linkage to recent interviews of Audra Hardt are in the works. Her songs are slated for inclusion in the forthcoming major motion picture, "THE SINGULARITY IS NEAR" by noted futurist Ray Kurzweil. Her initial network television performance will take place early in 2009. Please defer any deletion pending additional developments.

• Keep per nom -- Glidepath (talk) 23:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Most notability will happen in 2009, unless proven wrong. Otherwise she has a link with her participation in the soundtrack CIRCUIT. Defer any deletion.

• Keep per nom -- Dgoodberg (talk) 11:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. The nominator (myself) proposed deletion; the two "Keep per nom" !votes above make no sense - but are presumably intended as "Keep per my immediately preceding rationale". Please, however, see WP:CRYSTAL; if she becomes notable in 2009 then it would be entirely appropriate to recreate the article then, but we tend not to create articles on the off-chance. Ros0709 (talk) 20:23, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - appears to be an up and coming artist, but hasn't yet arrived. No reliable sources covering her. -- Whpq (talk) 17:58, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.