The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Merge cut-n-paste from spec sheets does not add any value, and these products get out of date quickly. I would add the Avaya VSP-9000 System to the list too. Perhaps one article for each line, e.g. the ERS line, secure router line, etc. would make more sense, with just a general overview and narrative of its evolution instead of marketing bullets. W Nowicki (talk) 17:47, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all all of these products are used in various managed network offerings. It would be helpful to individuals reseraching what has been installed at thier site to keep these entries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reskelund (talk • contribs) 23:39, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. The core products of Avaya are significant enough to merit discussion in the Avaya article, but I don't see much evidence that they are independently notable. Thparkth (talk)14:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all Added more content and 3rd citations so the products should now be WP:NOTABLE, WP:RS, WP:VERIFY. If you do not agree please identify the page and specifically state what you think is wrong and please give me a detailed explanation of what I can do to help improve the page to meet the requirements. Geek2003 (talk) 03:11, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
None of the sources I looked at were anything other than routine coverage (product announcments, technical specifications, etc). There is currently no evidence that this satisfies the general notability guideline. I also performed a google search of my own and found nothing. - Aaron Brenneman (talk) 04:26, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK I am going to take this one page at a time. The Avaya ERS 8600 page, in the Further reading section has 4 notable books that covers the product in detail, each are by a separate and independent authors. The references are from the, Electronic Engineering Times, IT World, NetworkWorld, Network Computing, and Cloud Computing. Specific and detailed 3rd party product evaluations were conducted by IPv6 and DISA of this product with detailed results. Additionally a detailed evaluation of the product was accomplished by the 3rd party Tolly Group, and there are many more like it (should I add them also). Please explain how this is just routine coverage. Geek2003 (talk) 18:41, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.