The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:11, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ayna Corporation

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Much of the content here appears to have been copyrighted by Aelfakih (talk · contribs) and although User:Quarl's amendments to the page have been commendable, most of it is still unencyclopedic and does not address the previous declined prod which had been removed on the basis of turning into a redirect but later reverted to its pre-prod state with little to no improvements. :| TelCo NaSpVe :| 08:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hardly any coverage [1]. LibStar (talk) 02:44, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:02, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any significant coverage to prove notability. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 14:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.