The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 23:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bart JC Devolder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable; does not meet WP:GNG. The single source under "references" does not support the paragraph it appears in. Of the external links, one mentions him in passing, one is a directory entry, and three do not appear to mention him at all. Mr Devolder appears to have a very impressive resume, but this does not make him notable. ubiquity (talk) 14:14, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 15:02, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 15:02, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear community, I was asked by many to start a wiki page, now this seems harder than I thought. I would like to get some clear reasons why the article keeps being up to be deleted. Being part of this project should be more than enough to be considered 'notable' Thanks for the clear feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasper2016 (talk • contribs) 08:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jasper2016: Please read WP:BIO guideline first; then please answer how does this biography meets the requirements there. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I don't see how he meets WP:BIO, only few mentions in passing in press/books. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete inadequate sources to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.