The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:11, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Chertoff[edit]

Benjamin Chertoff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log  • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Contributor to a few Popular Mechanics articles, but otherwise simply a 'freelance journalist.' Few or none of the sources are actually *about* him, they are just programs where he was a guest, or articles he contributed to. -Bonus Onus (talk) 05:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: Step 3 of the AfD nomination was not competed correctly. It has been fixed. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion A quick run-through of page sources and a brief Google search of this unfamiliar subject establishes sufficiently documented notability as far as I can see. Regards to all.Trilobitealive (talk) 21:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Seems his work is controversial enough to have spawned conspiracy theories. Lambanog (talk) 18:31, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep He does seem to have generated press about him, as well as press by him VASterling (talk) 17:52, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.