The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:15, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bryanna Reynolds

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources in the article mention her as being involved with these shows, but I am unable to find significant discussion of the individual in multiple reliable sources. ... discospinster _talk 19:39, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 19:39, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 19:39, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree with the nominator no significant coverage. Does not meet [WP:GNG]--Rrmmll22 (talk) 23:51, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to be just an entertainment reporter, one of hundreds. Oaktree b (talk) 13:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO. Simply appearing on Beauty and the Geek doesn't make you notable. LibStar (talk) 02:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.