The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 14:44, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Caffe Dolce (Vacaville, California)

[edit]
Caffe Dolce (Vacaville, California) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG. Local coffee shop. Lacks in-depth sig coverage in RS. MB 14:35, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since an editor has made substantial contributions to find sources for this article, specifically from the Vacaville Reporter, I would like to add a supplementary explanation as to why I have not changed my mind. The other articles from the Vacaville Reporter covering the coffeeshop it in its short lifespan only unfortunately provide trivial mentions, with the exception of the 1993 article, which is dedicated to this specific coffeeshop and to another one. Unfortunately, as WP:AUD reminds us, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability. No other sources seem to cover this business. In my opinion, there is insufficient notability to pass WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG, especially in light of the fact that it cannot inherit notability from dubiously notable artists visiting it (WP:INHERITORG). I remain convinced that this article should be deleted. Pilaz (talk) 19:08, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.