The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cody Alain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Number of references stopped me simply CsDing this, but they are mostly simply credits of his work (ie routine) & I see nothing that establishes notability. Created by new editor who has created several similar quasi-promotional articles. TheLongTone (talk) 18:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Citations, with few exceptions, the cited references indicate that Alain received stylist credit for a photo shoot. The few exceptions are instances when Alain was sought by a journalist as the "expert" to give some hair-styling tips. None of this indicates any significant coverage of Alain. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability, and promotional to boot. Deb (talk) 18:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete notability is not transferred. Hair and makeup by Cody Alain is not coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 09:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - he's a barber. No real significant coverage in sources. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:28, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete one of many articles (re!) created by the same PR agency of a non-notable individual. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.