The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 19:32, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool Victory

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The majority of the content of this article appears to be a hoax. I can find no evidence that these guys have ever actually competed in pro race. The source are mostly pure puffery and have no mention of this organization. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:12, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I'm not going to decide on something at the moment, though I think the content of the article seems to be contrary to the policies of WP:Notability and WP:HOAX. -- ISLANDERS27 09:10, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I was contacted by an ip user who claims to represent this organization. I have explained to them about reliable sources and added tags to the disputed claims in the article Beeblebrox (talk) 17:12, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:04, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I just saw a tumbleweed blow through this afd. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:07, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - none of the sources appear to back up any of the claims in the article. Lack of independent sources is a WP:N failure, even if the article isn't a hoax. Further, the article does not assert notability, which leaves the question of whether GT Racing teams are inherently notable (they may well be). - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:40, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. Probable hoax. "Based in the Empire State Building" my a--. JohnnyB256 (talk) 18:32, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a minor point of order, but only blatant and obvious hoaxes can be speedy deleted, probable hoaxes get their day in court. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:44, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.