The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coronations of Ethiopian Emperors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I’m nominating this article for deletion because it is a content fork on existing articles that adds nothing to them. There may be things to discuss about the coronations of Ethiopian emperors but this article doesn’t do that. It just tells us a bit about some emperors and mentions their coronation date. It doesn’t really serve any purpose and there’s nothing that needs to be merged somewhere else. Mccapra (talk) 13:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 13:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Question - Mccapra, it is a content fork on WHICH existing articles? Platonk (talk) 03:53, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Answer it’s a content fork of the articles on individual emperors, to which it doesn’t add anything. Mccapra (talk) 20:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Article was created by TheLEKReports who got sockpuppet-banned at SPI. Poorly constructed article, content doesn't match the title. We already have a List of Emperors of Ethiopia and Category:Emperors of Ethiopia, so that wasn't their intent. Doesn't appear to be a notable topic. Seems to fall under WP:Patent nonsense. Delete. Platonk (talk) 01:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Patent nonsense means completely unintelligible text. Geschichte (talk) 08:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree. It isn’t patent nonsense, it’s a random factoid fork. Mccapra (talk) 11:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Not essential. Struck. Now quit caviling! Platonk (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 01:43, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• delete Don't see why this had to be relisted, but at any rate it's just a junk fork. Mangoe (talk) 03:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.