The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Enochlau 05:01, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to flesh it out a bit; however, this seems like a completely new term invented this year - I haven't seen a source anywhere. At the very least, I think at least a year (until next "Cyber Monday") is needed to see if it actually establishes itself as a real term. -Tejastheory 00:30, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

71.244.133.88 16:42, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

cyber might be deprecated among the old guard of the internet, but casual internet users still use it (eg. cyber crime is used by government [1] and news now). --Interiot 18:03, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
did you even read the entry? The WP article reflects the same information as the businessweek article. What are you talking about? 69.142.21.24 01:13, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
NOW it does, and I'm happy about that. Keep the way it is.
Millions? Try thousands. Three orders of magnitude off. Even a much more restrictive search still gives 20× as many results, at least for what I checked. Weak keep for what it's worth. HorsePunchKid 2005-11-30 01:20:44Z
Interesting that you would just lie about the # of results for other days of the week. Try cyber+saturday or cyber+sunday (2.7-3 million hits on google) then come back. 131.107.0.73 21:31, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Lie? Hardly. You apparently do not know how to use Google properly. HorsePunchKid 2005-11-30 21:44:59Z


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.