The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 03:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Treble (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article does not provide notability criteria for a musical group. The references (inline and otherwise) don't provide any notability info (as far as Wikipedia is concerned) for the group. Killiondude (talk) 04:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say they pass WP:MUSIC#C8 for what is a notable award in their genre. If that doesn't fly, then those same ICCA awards go towards notability per C7 & C9.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 06:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: per Gibb. Schuym1 (talk) 06:34, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment- Hmmm. I'm inclined to agree with you now... I guess I'll wait and see what the consensus is (if other people have a say in this). Killiondude (talk) 06:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:21, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 11:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per music criteria 8 and 9. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:30, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.