The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-27 09:36Z

Denton Bible Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Delete Non notable. No references other than to Church websites. Адам Райли ^Talk 20:00, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete Claims pastor is "nationally known" so article creators should be able to find lots of independent published articles about him. That might help to satisfy WP:CHURCH. Added: The guideline proposal under construction was eliminated. Edison 20:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete again, and I will change my reccomendation if independent sources turn up. Also, note (again) that WP:CHURCH has been rejected for lack of consensus. Charlie 22:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment There seemed to be lots of editors contributing to it, then it was suddenly eliminated without any process that I could see. Seemed arbitrary. Now each church is up for grabs from general notions of what is notable. How can people take Wikipedia seriously when it has official guidelines for porn stars, but judges churches unworthy of such, then assumes all 2 lane highways are intrinsically noteworthy. Edison 05:28, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • There is still WP:CONG --Адам Райли ^Talk 16:41, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.