The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dita Field Hockey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost no coverage of the company in secondary sources, so fails WP:CORP. A search in Google web/News/Newspaper archive/Books/Bing web doesn't turn up anything more than one-off name-checks or sites selling their products. (For example, here—just one brief mention.) Highbeam has a few hits, but nothing that meets WP:CORP. (There's a one-off mention in the Washington Post and this laudatory piece in the Sunday Herald, but it seems to be an outright advertisement for Dita's products.) /wiae /tlk 15:35, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I should mention that they are occasionally named in sources like this one, in that they seem to have sponsored a field hockey tournament, but that's again not coverage of the company. /wiae /tlk 15:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as the current article has no conceivable signs of better satisfying the applicable notability guidelines. WP:TNT at best, SwisterTwister talk 23:57, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:57, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:57, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:57, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:57, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.