The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:06, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
BLP of questionable notability, and it appears that the subject has repeatedly requested the deletion of the article. If this were Prince Charles, that obviously wouldn't matter, but we're dealing with a small-business owner here. Regardless of the subject's preferences (and more importantly), he just doesn't seem notable enough to warrant an encyclopedia article. Only a couple hundred Google hits; owning a boutique does not require encyclopedic coverage faithless (speak) 05:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There were some other claims to notability in earlier versions of the article but they were uncited and uncertain. Delete: unnotable.Babakathy (talk) 06:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Lots of plausible claims, but no independent evidence of notability. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:09, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Had the earlier claims been sourced, I might feel differently. However, nothing is there now that indicates that this person is notable. →Wordbuilder (talk) 13:37, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't see anything here asserted that would make him actually notable--whether or not he wanted to be included. DGG (talk) 05:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO GtstrickyTalk or C 14:38, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Anonymous editor 69.143.57.71 did actually post the below text to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, but it was reverted as vandalism as it was posted in the wrong place: