The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jclemens (talk) 00:50, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dominique Dane

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this 27-word stub fails utterly to meet any of the WP:Pornbio criteria, in addition to the fact that she has no demonstrable Notability what-so-ever. She has appeared in a grand total of three (3) films, and has never been so much as nominated for an award. Her two sources are both porn industry-related (nothing from AVN, by the way, just a profile at IAFD, and her name included in a list of former Penthouse centerfolds). She had a very brief career beginning in 2002, and ending in 2003. This article is pretty close to being a sort of avatar of unNotability. If this woman is deemed Notable, its difficult to imagine how anyone who has ever appeared in a single adult film (or three of them, anyway) could ever be deemed unNotable. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 09:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not present intersections of reliable independent secondary sources. Per WP:BIO. Algébrico (talk) 04:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.