The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Driftbomb

[edit]
Driftbomb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician lacking non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 04:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, it doesn't. Not a single "source" here is a reliable one; they're all directly-affiliated primary sources. A musician does not, for instance, get a Wikipedia article just because he has a page on Twitter or Soundcloud or his own record label's website — he gets an article when real media are writing about him. Bearcat (talk) 07:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when real reliable source coverage is there. Bearcat (talk) 07:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.