The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article is premature. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edmonton municipal election, 2010

[edit]

Article based solely on speculation. If the date given in the article is correct, the election will not take place for more than a year, and at this time more than half of the position are filled with some variation of "No one has expressed intent to run for this, but ___ is widely believed to have the intent to run". The other half simply have the first portion of this sentence. Xenocide^Talk^|^{Contributions} 03:14, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: date is correct, but why bother starting an municipal election page when no one is running for mayor yet? Hairhorn (talk) 04:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:CRYSTAL. Drawn Some (talk) 03:24, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:CRYSTAL at the moment. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 05:45, 16 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Delete; premature and what encyclopedic content there is is unsourced. Smile a While (talk) 17:45, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.