The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pretty clear that the deletes have it, on policy reasons. As a self-standing article it serves no purpose, and lacks a rationale for existence. Drmies (talk) 18:40, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

English and French monarchs overlap chart

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to me like trivia. Feedback ^☎ 03:10, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this seems to me to be a comparative resource related to the history of two powerful European nations. If anything it might be expanded if neighbouring nations had monarchs at the time. Gregkaye (talk) 10:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We'd be talking about a different article if you want something of a larger scope. An side-by-side list of English and French monarchs is just trivia/cruft/content forking. Feedback ^☎ 00:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy It's unsourced and only has value in the chart. This material belongs as a an article spun off from France–United Kingdom relations. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:57, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing would be trivial from any of the many history books and articles on Anglo-French relations. Unless you believe the information is substantially incorrect, it's irrelevant to deletion. And why are you saying it belongs as a spin-off but wanting to delete it? --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:09, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - it is utterly harmless and someone may fiond it useful. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Inaccurate cruft. Srnec (talk) 17:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It is more than just a side-by-side list of English and French monarchs, the information on wars and marriages is helpful in understanding the changing relationship between these nations without having to read through text heavy articles. Expand with more useful historical context. NoSeptember 01:14, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or repurpose. As a singular table, it serves no purpose other than trivia. As a part of a narrative of the British/French long-standing feud or France-United Kingdom relations, it might be very useful indeed.--Coin945 (talk) 16:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No need for a separate article. Perhaps the table/information can be repurposed, as suggested, in an article such as France-United Kingdom relations though. Sotakeit (talk) 12:51, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as pointless trivia. It doesn't really provide any useful information because monarchs weren't always driving forces behind foreign politics anyway (as the list tries to imply), and dynasties weren't particularly closely related either.--Staberinde (talk) 15:24, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.