The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Familia Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Six years after the article was deleted I can’t still see this independent musical organization passing our notability criteria. They lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Celestina007 (talk) 19:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. None of the references is anything remotely like substantial coverage of the subject in an independent source, nor have I seen anything anywhere else which suggests that this company comes near to satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. JBW (talk) 21:36, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: (The article refers to the label in the present tense, but I haven't been able to find any mention of any record released more recently than 2005, so I wonder whether it is still in existence, as the article implies. Obviously that isn't in itself a reason for deletion, but it does raise doubts about the reliability of the article.) JBW (talk) 21:55, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Per nom. I searched on duckduckgo but unable to find reliable coverage. Mtpos (talk) 13:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - agree with nominator. Not enough articles about them can be found. Jaxarnolds (talk) 06:21, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.