The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Firozpur Road

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject has been tagged with ((notability)) since April 2009. Unable to locate evidence of non-trivial coverage of this particular road, please do not hesitate to contact me should said coverage be located during the course of this discussion. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 01:12, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 02:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 02:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete is there actual coverage, otherwise there are verifiability concerns. LibStar (talk) 14:41, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It has been brought to my attention that a redirect from Ferozpur Road to Firozpur Road was forked into a redundant article during the course of this discussion. [1] I have included it here for consideration, as the same concerns apply to either spelling. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:17, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both—the same notability concerns apply to both articles as written. If "significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject" can be found, per WP:GNG, then I would re-evaluate my position, but at this time, these articles do not merit inclusion. Imzadi 1979 → 12:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both Notability appears to be a bit of a problem, both articles also appear to centre around the transit system that uses the road. Nothing significant if note. NordicDragon Talkpage 08:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.