The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After decrapification and rewrite.  Sandstein  08:23, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flexible tanks[edit]

Flexible tanks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Incomprehensible text, seems to be corporate or advertising mrw (talk) 10:04, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 10:48, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've boldly cleaned up the article (more or less a revert to before May 2012) with the more sensible OR snippets from May 2012, added these sources and started with an inline ref. Help please. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Have added some more, we're up to 7 inline citations and a nice history now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:55, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.