The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Duck universe. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Duckburg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search for references did not find sufficient WP:RS content to support this article as written, Fails WP:N and WP:V. The prod was removed with a link to a Wikipedia article used as a reference (later removed per WP:RS). A search for usage of "Fort Duckburg" in Wikipedia did not suggest a redirect to me. Jeepday (talk) 22:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to The Life and Times of Scrooge McDuck. Jclemens (talk) 15:38, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or merge to Duck universe. Fictional places are almost never individually notable in the real world to deserve a separate article, and this article doesn't even say why it's notable in the fictional world. – sgeureka ^t•c 16:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• There looks to be at least one good source on this[1], although you'd have to go to the library. Since I doubt anyone will work on it soon, though, just redirect to Duck Universe of Scrooge McDuck. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 16:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Duck universe#Duckburg. Famous enough in the comics to be at least mentioned. JIP | Talk 05:54, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Duck universe. Karanacs (talk) 14:18, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge due to a lack of sources to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:19, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.