The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 17:47, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Goblin submachine gun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable prototype that never made it to production Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 17:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I was going to say "merge to KB-ST, which is the parent company that made the design, but there is no article. In other words, the author of this and two other gun model articles thought it worthwhile to make an article about specific models of gun -- even one that never went into production -- from a defunct Ukranian arms manufacturer, but not that the arms manufacturer was sufficiently notable for an article itself. Obviously, if people are really, really, really interested in guns, then there can be an article on the arms maker that designed these weapons. If there isn't enough notability for that, there surely isn't enough for a single weapon. Hithladaeus (talk) 18:27, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Agree and that's what I would have done if the article on the parent company existed.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 18:30, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Cool name but not worthy of any article. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 14:45, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:MILNG.--Tomandjerry211 (Let's have a chat) 14:40, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: For the reasons stated above...Also, the references appear to be nothing more than a photo and specs. Plus, the only sources of information on this gun appear to be Wikipedia or Wiki mirrors.--RAF910 (talk) 04:38, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I couldn't find much in the way of sources for this one, as such the subject seems to lack "significant coverage" in reliable sources and fails notability under the WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 16:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.