The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Hyatt Islamabad

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of this article is a property of an established hotel chain which lacks individual notability. Steps were taken WP:BEFORE this nomination to locate non-trivial coverage for this particular property, but were not successful. Please do not hesitate to contact me should appropriate sources be located during the course of this discussion. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 01:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 01:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - At first, I thought this was a clear keep because of WP:NGEO. However, looking more closely at the guideline, it says that commercial developments can be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance. They require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability. I find no reliable sources that aren't to promote the building. I feel a redirect to Constitution Avenue (Islamabad) isn't plausible because looking at the only reference, it is a travel guide, and so the article might be deleted by its' own. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 13:06, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:42, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete also as none of this convinces the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 01:11, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.