The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete. - Philippe 04:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gray witch[edit]

Gray witch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is a procedural nomination. The original nomination became plagued with procedural issues and rather than trying to sort out that disaster, I am giving the discussion a fresh start. The initial complaint was that this article may fail WP:OR. Shereth 22:54, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment- I'm not going to vote here, I just want to mention something in passing. I have adopted the original author of the material, User:Condalence, userfied both Gray Witch and Gray Magic (although I think the end product will probably be a merger of the two), and we are slowly working on finding reliable sources and improving the articles themselves. L'Aqùatique[review] 23:26, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for Now Since L'Aqùatique seems to be pushing for the creator to work on it some more, I believe this article may become acceptable in the future. If in a few months it isn't, then I believe we should delete it.--SJP (talk) 01:41, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.