The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I couldn't help but notice that that nominator says "the organization has only become less notable". Per WP:NTEMP if this organization was notable at the tima of the first AFD then it's notable now. Though the nominator later expressed doubts about the subject ever being notable, after 3 weeks there is only 1 "per nom" delete !vote so "no consensus" is the right call here. No prejudice against a speedy renomination. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Healthy Mothers Healthy Babies[edit]

Healthy Mothers Healthy Babies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In the four years since the last discussion, the organization has only become less notable. It appears to have been a one time industry initiative in 2007. Additionally, it is an obvious copyright violation. Thanks! -IchWeigereMich (ʎ /ʘ) 13:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's one issue, though I think there are still questions of notability. In the previous deletion discussion, it was noted that Google has many results for "Health Mothers Healthy Babies", but looking closer, that search brings up very little that is related to this specific organization, and when it is, it looks like press releases. Thanks again!--IchWeigereMich (ʎ /ʘ) 20:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 22:30, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.