The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep, interesting, encyclopedic despite being minor. As I said in earlier AfDs, this is a work of dynamic modern art which deserves an article on Wikipedia. There are enough 3rd party reliable sources as well. --GerritCUTEDH23:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.