The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hugezhuang Line (Beijing Subway) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any references to this line. None whatsoever. In English or Chinese. Nothing. Also, I went to Tongzhoubeiyuan the other day, and I didn't see anything going on. Azylber (talk) 23:08, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this planned line per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER. Bearian (talk) 17:52, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No planned line should have an article, unless it has generated some significant controversy or such. But then the article should be about the controversy, not the line. Colipon+(Talk) 02:23, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I can't find any references to this line. None whatsoever. In English or Chinese. Nothing. Also, I went to Tongzhoubeiyuan the other day, and I didn't see anything going on.Azylber (talk) 07:24, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.