The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 16:56, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ice Age: Th4w

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is based solely on rumors. Production for this supposedly film has not even started and no names have been officially given. Mike Allen ^{talk · contribs} 20:05, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete. Well-sourced rumors discussed in mainstream may warrant a wikipedia article, which may be merged into the final article. But I see no references. - Altenmann >t 20:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What mainstrem websites? aintitcool.com, teaser-trailer, or [1] (fan blog). I don't see any reliable mainstream website reporting this. --Mike Allen ^{talk · contribs} 20:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - started to say speedy, but creator was neither Bambifan101 nor the sequel vandal A4d49f4a (though he is the main contributor) as I initially suspected. Completely fails WP:NF and WP:V. Random rumors are not verification. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:CRYSTAL. Joe Chill (talk) 00:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Rumors no matter how many are not reliable sources.Cablespy (talk) 16:12, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Mike Allen ^{talk · contribs} 23:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, article is based on rumors not sources per WP:V. BOVINEBOY 2008 :) 02:16, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Ice Age (film series). Sorry to disagree, but while the "proposed" title is nothing but conjecture, a possible 4th in the series of Ice Age films has been discussed in many reliable sources, and as such speculaton is verifiable, meets the requirements for inclusion in some form as set forth in WP:Crystal and WP:GNG. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why should we redirect Ice Age: Th4w to the Ice Age film series or even merge that name? Ice Age 4 has not even been announced. --Mike Allen ^{talk · contribs} 03:09, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as Ice Age 4, but not with this ridiculous title, or any variations of it. Darrenhusted (talk) 23:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No doubt the sourced information would be okay in a section at Ice Age (film series) called Ice Age 4, proposed film. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How can Wikipedia propose a film that has not been announced? Maybe you can find that source? I mean even if was rumored it would be on IMDb (like every other anticipated sequel), but it's not even listed there! --Mike Allen ^{talk · contribs} 06:15, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.