The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:34, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Independent-Green Party US (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable political party fails WP:NORG (t · c) buidhe 04:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America. (t · c) buidhe 04:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Independent-Green Party US is notable enough to be on Wikipedia. Their state affiliates in Alaska, Geogia, Rhode Island, and Virginia already have a Wikipedia page. The 2008 Green presidential nominee Cynthia McKinney supports and is a member of the party. There has been no failure to meet notability standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackrobert007 (talk • contribs) 04:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackrobert007: Comments in discussions are placed at the bottom, and notability is not inherited — you must provide at least two independent reliable, secondary sources about Independent-Green Party US. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LaundryPizza03: with all due respect, notability inheritance was not the argument I justified this page’s creation with, a political party organization and it’s notability are the product of its membership (state party affiliates and notable individuals involved) and work. The Independent-Green Party US is a notable parent organization to the affiliated notable branches of this said parent organization. In addition, more than two sources proving the organization’s notability and notable work have been added. –<b — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackrobert007 (talk • contribs) 07:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment An ANI report about this AfD has been opened at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Suspicious_AfD_closure. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:07, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• DeleteThere is an absence of significant, independent secondary coverage of this organization (see WP:NORG, WP:NEXIST, WP:ORGDEPTH; WP:BRANCH might also apply), indicative of, or at least consistent with, WP:TOOSOON. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 08:05, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 07:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:46, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – 333-blue at 06:06, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The relatively generic words in the name make is hard to search for without getting results about other parties, but I was not able to find significant independent coverage about this party, and the sources already provided in the article are definitely not enough to establish notability. --RL0919 (talk) 15:38, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.