The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Any userfy requests may be directed to my talk page. I am salting the article additionally for a month. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 08:33, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inna Muddanu Mahalingeshwara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This unsourced article has no content. It contains no assertion of notability and does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. The article has been recreated and speedily deleted four times. The latest speedy deletion and prod tags were removed without comment by suspected sockpuppet accounts (User:Amsanilkumar and User:Amsanilkumar77 then IP User:203.124.18.29. The article exists, still without substantive content or sources in userspace at User:Amsanilkumar/Inna_Muddanu. Claviere (talk) 08:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per CSD-A1. My76Strat (talk) 08:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep there is now some content in the form of pictures and an infobox. Still no text, claim of importance or reference. I have restored the AFD notice on the article. The article editor removed it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Since when do we keep articles because they have pictures and an infobox? Ryan Vesey Review me! 13:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • The original reason for deletion was because tehre was no content, so now there is, however i will change my vot to userfy (which it is already and salt until the draft proves it self. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:N. Does not receive significant coverage. Google searches yielded pages of similar names, but do not talk explicitly about the temple. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 10:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete Per WP:IAR This article exists in the person's user page! He has repeatedly created this article and refuses to improve it. Why he thinks he should create a new article when I have explained to him that he can improve it here is beyond me. Ryan Vesey Review me! 13:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:10, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment considering that this has been repeatedly created, can the title get salted? If there is a genuine article in the making, it can be created in the userspace and moved later. Ryan Vesey Review me! 22:13, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No evidence of notability. While I would like to see some WP:SALT applied, the article creator is already making each new article with a different variation of the name, I doubt create protecting will be effective. It may just require application of CSD G4 to any future recreations. Monty₈₄₅ 05:13, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I've added a sourced lead section for context. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:38, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.