The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 19:32, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A combination of promotional copy and word salad. It's possible that the topic of this article is deserving of coverage in Wikipedia, but after a careful reading of the article I couldn't determine what its topic was.
Moreover, the use of phrasings such as " 'paradigmatic' methodology" and "the nature of human existence has been determinately shaped as the functional ‘value’ derived through the translation and practical application of that same knowledge" suggests that the article has been written to be incomprehensible in order to inoculate it against criticism ("you just don't understand the subject").
I don't know whether we ought to have an article on this topic, but I think the article we have is not appropriate for Wikipedia. — Gavia immer (talk) 01:57, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]