The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 03:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Internet systematics

[edit]

Article describes a non-notable group; as noted on its talk page by the author, "Of course is a new term, not "established" but no harm can be done by collectively creating a new term of something that exists by many different names, as the entry text warns." I requested it for speedy deletion; another user removed the tag for a reason that I don't understand, but since it was removed I brought it here. Nyttend 18:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The intent seems to be to use Wikipedia as a tool for original research, or at least a compilation of it. Propaniac 19:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I dont think this topic is relevant enough right now to warrant a page Corpx 19:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I removed the speedy tag since the criteria for speedy deletion don't apply to words, only people and organizations. Still, this article seems to be unverifiable, not to mention a neologism. --Mr. Lefty (talk) 19:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as neologism. Useight 20:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - It looks like a speedy to me. --Stormbay 21:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.