The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Understandably the members of this band may not require pages as there is not alot of information available on them, however, the band itself is quite noteable, having been active for nearly a decade, having toured regionally, put out multiple albums under their own label, and having worked collaboratively with multiple artists and organizations. In addition the band surfaces on multiple pages in results listed through google and yahoo, when searched for respecively. Slaughterhouseo1 11:18EST, 23 March 2007
Delete unless there's at least the vaguest assertion of notability on there by the end of this AfD; at the moment from the article their biggest claim to fame seems to be being so bad that a crowd threw bottles at them. - Iridescenti18:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no sources which either assert or support notability for this band. Furthermore, I'm pretty sure the image on the page violates the image guidelines. (Not the content; the jiggling) --Haemo00:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Need to have toured nationally, put out albums on a major label and have some significant media coverage - none of which this band has. -Nv8200ptalk21:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.