The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Contested prod following deletion, with advertising and likely lack of notability as the original rationale. Procedural nomination. Neutral. Michaelas1009:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, csd a7, article doesn't assert notability. I can't find anything else that would be notable about them in the 16 google hits so anything further that was written would likely be unverifiable. - Bobet11:10, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.