The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson Ducasse

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable content creator. WP:GNG. All sources in the article do not even mention the person in question. Nothing salvageable, and can't find anything. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 20:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 21:03, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 21:03, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 21:03, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as still questionable for WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; essentially no coverage demonstrating that the subject meets WP:CREATIVE, WP:BIO or WP:GNG. /wiae /tlk 18:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - run of the mill producer. Producers are not automatically notable as creative people. The sourcing is really terrible - blogs, self-created content, and YouTube. A stub would have to be started from scratch. Bearian (talk) 17:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.