The result was no consensus. While the hoax concerns appear to have been addressed, there is not a clear consensus that there's reliable source material at the moment. At the same time, there isn't a clear consensus to delete the article, and conversations about a rename, or redirect should continue editorially. Star Mississippi 16:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The topic—if not a hoax—is not notable. Not a single reliable source has bothered to document the existence of any such region. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
quotation
|
---|
|
quotation
|
---|
|
- NitinMlk (talk) 20:28, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
References
whereas the Jats lived in the Jangal-desh (a portion of ancient Kuru-Jangal region), which covers Bikanir and some portion of the Jodhpur State.
"The old name of the territories which went to constitute the Rathore principality of Bikaner, had been 'Jangal Desh'.
((cite book))
: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
In a different context, a part of the desert land now part of the administrative division of Bikaner was apparently known as 'Jangal' (also 'Jangal-desh).
((cite book))
: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
There is good reason to believe that parts of the present north-eastern and north-western Rajasthan were inhabited by Jat clans ruled by their own chiefs and largely governed by their own customary law.
((cite book))
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:27, 4 January 2022 (UTC)