The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 16:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jianping Ge

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lots of references to what this professor has written - but where is the beef as to his notability? I don't see it. Unless notability shown, delete. --Nlu (talk) 15:12, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as google scholar shows highly cited works, one with over 900 cites and five over 400 as shown here so criteria 1 of WP:ACADEMIC is passed, as it is determined by the number of cites so the article should be kept, regards, Atlantic306 (talk) 15:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC) struck as it was a different professor of the same name Atlantic306 (talk) 11:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:44, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:46, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:47, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:53, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The mentioned works with high citation counts don't seem to be authored by him. "Superparamagnetic magnetite colloidal nanocrystal clusters" certainly doesn't seem like the work of an environmental economist. These publications aren't mentioned in the list of publications in the article either. --Tataral (talk) 22:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. To avoid publications by that other Jianping Ge (who may well pass WP:PROF#C1) I searched Google Scholar by title for the publications listed in this article. The citation counts I found were 28, 27, 21, 18... with an h-index of 9. Spot-checking the 28-citation paper found that about a third of the listed citations were self-citations (I don't think this is any form of academic misconduct, it's just what happens when citation counts are low). In any case, this is not enough for WP:PROF#C1 and we don't seem to have any evidence of other forms of academic notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:11, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete @Atlantic306: there are several academics named Jianping Ge, and the most cited one you mentioned is actually a chemist at East China Normal University (born 1980), who has a Baidu page. Another notable Jianping Ge (born 1962) is an ecologist and Vice President of Beijing Normal University who's won multiple national awards, see here. The Jianping Ge (born 1982) under discussion does not yet seem to satisfy WP:NACADEMIC, although he's won some municipal awards of Beijing and may become notable in the future, see his bio. -Zanhe (talk) 07:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- thanks, striking my keep vote Atlantic306 (talk) 11:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no notable Anupam (talk) 19:52, 02 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.