The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 13:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kilt variants (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Looks like a personal essay masquerading as an article. Or possibly another attempt to advance the usual agenda. Guy (Help!) 19:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Stab with my Sgian Dubh all covered in Kilt. This is effectively a POV fork of silliness.--Doc^g 19:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Kilt, if there's any information here that's worth it over there (and that's sourced properly) and redirect. Tony Fox (arf!) 03:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I can't find anything in the article worth merging to Kilt...gracious. --InkSplotch 05:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Additional comment: -2 pts from Guy for making me look up the word "Neologism", but it did lead me to WP:NEO which he might enjoy for beating out the word "unbifurcated". --InkSplotch 05:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I'm not sure I understand what the POV or agenda is, but I agree that the article seems to be a confusing and unnecessary fork of the kilt article. The title is at odds with the actual content.--Kubigula (talk) 22:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as POV fork in traditional Scots style per The Doc. tomasz. 11:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.