The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a7, no claim of notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:29, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kittens At Play (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested ProD. Prod summary added by Excirial was

“

No indication of Notability

”

Intelligentsium 23:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete (A7) as there is not even a claim to notability here. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:56, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 23:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:BAND. Crafty (talk) 00:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It fails WP:BAND and no sign of notability. Basket of Puppies 01:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.