The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closed early for BLP concerns. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 21:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kitty Coni

[edit]

Apparently non-notable biography, only evidence of notability provided is that her page has had two million hits, which establishes some limited notability but I can't see that it's enough to meet WP:BIO. Google found 30 hits on her name, most appear to be forum posts. No other references given except her own page. Only the original author has edited the article content. Mark Grant (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a database for network cliques. --Evb-wiki (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unable to find any independent coverage to establish notability. Off-topic, but does 'skin creator' without context creep anybody else out, or is it just me? Maralia (talk) 17:12, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the nominator, no significant Ghits that aren't forum posts. Any notability seems to be entirely within the boundaries of the single website and not having penetrated beyond its limits. Accounting4Taste:talk 17:17, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, also reads like a fan-page or a myspace account. Definitely has no place in an enclyclopedia. -RiverHockey (talk) 01:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of proof of notability. Someguy1221 (talk) 18:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.