The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to lack notability. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lavita raynor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist, fails WP:MUSICBIO JMHamo (talk) 22:48, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 23:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Questionable including for both notability, better sourcing and a better article overall. SwisterTwister talk 06:57, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete The lack of a claim of notability and support for that claim is the issue here. Need for "better sourcing" is an argument to improve the article and the claim that "a better article overall" is desired is not a justification for deletion. If the sourcing can be provided, the article should be retained no matter how much work is needed to improve the article. Alansohn (talk) 16:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I keep finding an actress named LaVita Raynor. Is she the same person? short mention, [1]. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.