The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 22:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lennox Sisters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. These ladies had no notability in their own right; no citations; the article has been created as a very messy spin-off from the one about their father. --Jack | ^{talk page} 20:00, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No independent notability even asserted. Resolute 03:17, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Good catch. Resolute 15:46, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per Reso --Cybercobra (talk) 05:07, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Noblewomen of this stature played a sufficient role in society to be notable. The article has a good source: Stella Tillyard (1994). Aristocrats. Caroline, Emily, Louise, and Sarah Lennox 1740–1832. London: Chatto and Windus. This is a reputable publisher, not a mere reprinter of family genealogies . The book is in most large university libraries. [1]. A book specifically about someone is a very good indication of notability. The article is undoubtedly expandable from the book, which will have sources listed. DGG ( talk ) 05:37, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per DGG. Still spinning from the 180 turn. --Cybercobra (talk) 05:56, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.